<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Felipe Antolinez's Weblog: podcast</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://antolinez.ch/</id><updated>2026-04-20T14:07:33.482921+00:00</updated><author><name>Felipe Antolinez</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Sally Kornbluth</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/20/kornbluth-lollipop-of-mediocrity/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-04-20T14:07:33.482921+00:00</published><updated>2026-04-20T14:07:33.482921+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/20/kornbluth-lollipop-of-mediocrity/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/long-strange-trip-ceo-to-ceo-with-brian-halligan/id1852309009?i=1000761782390"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The way you maintain meritocracy and excellence is to make sure that each person you bring in, and for us, this means all of our faculty, all of our staff, all of our students, we have to consistently focus on excellence. There was a colleague of mine at Duke who had a sign in his office that said, &lt;strong&gt;if you take a lick of the lollipop of mediocrity, you will suck forever.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/long-strange-trip-ceo-to-ceo-with-brian-halligan/id1852309009?i=1000761782390"&gt;Sally Kornbluth&lt;/a&gt;, Long Strange Trip podcast interview with Sally Kornbluth, MIT's president.&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/management"&gt;management&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="management"/><category term="podcast"/></entry><entry><title>An AI State of the Union: We've Passed the Inflection Point, Dark Factories Are Coming, and Automation Timelines | Simon Willison (Lenny's Podcast)</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/13/willison-ai-state-of-the-union-lennys-podcast/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-04-13T11:16:31.378778+00:00</published><updated>2026-04-13T11:16:31.378778+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/13/willison-ai-state-of-the-union-lennys-podcast/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/an-ai-state-of-the-union"&gt;An AI State of the Union: We&amp;#x27;ve Passed the Inflection Point, Dark Factories Are Coming, and Automation Timelines | Simon Willison (Lenny&amp;#x27;s Podcast)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
As someone who follows Simon Willison closely, this interview didn't contain many new ideas for me. But I would still strongly recommend it to anyone who doesn't follow him as closely, because it covers many of his main beliefs and insights in one place, and I consider many of them to be very strong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main thing I picked up from the podcast is &lt;a href="https://factory.strongdm.ai/"&gt;StrongDM's work on the "dark factory"&lt;/a&gt;, which Simon &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/7/software-factory/"&gt;covered on his own blog&lt;/a&gt; and is definitely worth reading. I have heard the "dark (software) factory" term before and didn't quite understand it, but it is an analogy for manufacturing facilities so automated that the lights are literally turned off because no humans are operating the factory. The core idea of this movement is building development factory in which specs and scenarios drive coding agents to &lt;strong&gt;write and review (!) code without humans&lt;/strong&gt; completely autonomously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other things I picked up from this podcast episode: the distinction between &lt;a href="/2026/Apr/8/vibe-coding-vs-agentic-engineering/"&gt;agentic engineering and vibe coding&lt;/a&gt;, using "red/green TDD" as a micro-prompt to improve coding agent output, and the strategy of building "digital twins" of external services for testing by giving a coding agent just public API docs.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/coding-agents"&gt;coding-agents&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/software-engineering"&gt;software-engineering&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="coding-agents"/><category term="ai"/><category term="software-engineering"/><category term="podcast"/></entry><entry><title>An Interview with Asymco's Horace Dediu About Apple at 50 (Stratechery)</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/7/dediu-ai-sustaining-not-disruptive/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-04-07T06:58:51.674499+00:00</published><updated>2026-04-07T06:58:51.674499+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/7/dediu-ai-sustaining-not-disruptive/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://stratechery.com/2026/an-interview-with-asymcos-horace-dediu-about-apple-at-50/"&gt;An Interview with Asymco&amp;#x27;s Horace Dediu About Apple at 50 (Stratechery)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Horace Dediu, who has worked closely with Clay Christensen, makes an interesting point in this interview about why, in his view, AI is a sustaining technology for the big incumbents rather than a disruption. Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon are all pouring hundreds of billions into AI instead of being repelled by it and thinking "this isn't for us" or "our customers don't want this". So obviously they all think that AI is a sustaining technology for them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The interesting exception is Apple, which is the only major tech company that, unlike most others, isn't sprinting to spend as much as possible on AI infrastructure. In Horace Dediu's view, Apple has always positioned itself at the interface between humans and computers, and thinks that the current AI interface (essentially a command line for natural language) isn't where they'd want to compete. Whether Apple is making a smart strategic bet by waiting for the technology to commoditize and then controlling the device and interface layer, or whether they're the one incumbent that actually is being disrupted, is the open question.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/stratechery"&gt;stratechery&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/apple"&gt;apple&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="stratechery"/><category term="ai"/><category term="podcast"/><category term="apple"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Horace Dediu</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/4/horace-dediu-engineering-vs-business-school/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-04-04T07:30:55.264140+00:00</published><updated>2026-04-04T07:30:55.264140+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Apr/4/horace-dediu-engineering-vs-business-school/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://stratechery.com/2026/an-interview-with-asymcos-horace-dediu-about-apple-at-50/"&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you learn engineering, you learn first science and you learn basic physics and chemistry, you learn mathematics, and you learn that things are axiomatic and things are built on top of each other so that there's consistency all the way up the stack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[...]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But then when you go to a business school, you realize the way I put it retrospectively is that it's like equivalent of sitting around a campfire telling stories to one another.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://stratechery.com/2026/an-interview-with-asymcos-horace-dediu-about-apple-at-50/"&gt;Horace Dediu&lt;/a&gt;, From Ben Thompson's interview with Asymco's Horace Dediu on Apple at 50.&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/stratechery"&gt;stratechery&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="stratechery"/><category term="podcast"/></entry><entry><title>From skeptic to true believer: How OpenClaw changed my life (Lenny's Podcast)</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/30/claire-vo-openclaw-lennys-podcast/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-03-30T07:18:50.437529+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-30T07:18:50.437529+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/30/claire-vo-openclaw-lennys-podcast/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/lennys-podcast-product-career-growth/id1627920305?l=en-GB&amp;amp;i=1000758037099"&gt;From skeptic to true believer: How OpenClaw changed my life (Lenny&amp;#x27;s Podcast)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
This is the podcast on OpenClaw I listened to this weekend after the &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/29/karpathy-code-agents-autoresearch-claws/"&gt;Karpathy episode&lt;/a&gt;. I think I &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Feb/3/openclaw-proactive-ai/"&gt;understood the appeal&lt;/a&gt; of a proactive system that works independently from the start, but I haven't bought into the hype so far. However, I feel that these two podcasts together have started changing my mind—not because of a single capability, but because of the apparent emergent behavior that arises once a Claw has context about you and access to real tools. Agents, as we typically think of them, are reactive: you give them a task, and they execute what they are asked to do. But I now fully realize that Claws are persistent and have personalities of their own. They run in the background, build up memory over time, check in on a schedule, and start acting on your behalf without being prompted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claire Vo, who was apparently a big OpenClaw skeptic when it launched, now manages nine agents across multiple Mac Minis for both personal and professional use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first thing that stood out to me in this conversation is how well the onboarding is apparently done. Instead of structured forms and settings pages, your Claw just asks you who it is and who you are, and you figure it out together through conversation, as if you hired a new employee. The second thing I learned is how well-crafted the default behavior of the Claw appears to be. The Claw's behavior emerges from some simple markdown files ("soul document"), but the defaults are apparently surprisingly thoughtful and lead to a really pleasant behavior. It sounds like this is something anyone working in product right now should experience firsthand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm now genuinely intrigued to try it myself. To really get the full experience, you clearly need to run it on a separate machine, both for security and because you don't want to think about whether your laptop is online. I should really try setting one up on my Raspberry Pi, or just buy a Mac Mini for it. The other thing I don't really have yet is a clear use case for a Claw. I wonder whether I should try to come up with one before getting started, or whether this is something you just have to go for, because the onboarding seems good enough that the use case will emerge during the setup process.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/agentic-ai"&gt;agentic-ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/product"&gt;product&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/claws"&gt;claws&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="ai"/><category term="agentic-ai"/><category term="product"/><category term="podcast"/><category term="claws"/></entry><entry><title>Andrej Karpathy on Code Agents, AutoResearch, and the Loopy Era of AI (No Priors Podcast)</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/29/karpathy-code-agents-autoresearch-claws/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-03-29T07:50:40+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-29T07:50:40+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/29/karpathy-code-agents-autoresearch-claws/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/no-priors-artificial-intelligence-technology-startups/id1668002688?i=1000756334966"&gt;Andrej Karpathy on Code Agents, AutoResearch, and the Loopy Era of AI (No Priors Podcast)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Andrej Karpathy is always worth listening to because he has the time to experiment and tinker with the latest developments in a way that most people working at companies don't. He effectively lives a few months in the future compared to the rest of us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two things stuck with me from this conversation. First, Karpathy frames Claws (from OpenClaw) as another layer of the AI stack: LLMs → Agents → Claws. I have never actually set up a Claw yet, but the persistent memory architecture and how "your Claw" gets to know you over time are things I want to experiment with, as this is directly relevant to what we're working on at Ren as the product becomes more agentic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, his work on AutoResearch. We've discussed the concept internally at Ren multiple times over the past few months, but never found the time to actually try it. We have a concrete problem that would lend itself well to this approach: building a more efficient multi-label classifier. We currently use a relatively heavy model for it, we have abundant training data, and the objective is clear (maximize precision/recall/F1 for a given latency budget). We could just let an AutoResearch system loose on this task. What I'm missing is knowing how to set up a sandbox that's safe enough but has sufficient permissions for the agent to carry out the research on its own. The meta task would then be similar to Claws: build a system in a few markdown files that defines how the agent approaches and documents its research.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/coding-agents"&gt;coding-agents&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/agentic-ai"&gt;agentic-ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/ren"&gt;ren&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/claws"&gt;claws&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="coding-agents"/><category term="ai"/><category term="agentic-ai"/><category term="ren"/><category term="podcast"/><category term="claws"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Paul Graham</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/21/paul-graham-marry-someone-sane/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-03-21T12:18:28+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-21T12:18:28+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/21/paul-graham-marry-someone-sane/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/the-social-radars/id1677066062?i=1000756176917"&gt;&lt;p&gt;How do I keep a sane mind? Well, &lt;strong&gt;it's important to be married to someone sane&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean, it sounds like a strange compliment to describe someone as sane, but the older you are, the more you realize that's actually a fairly unique quality. And so if you're married to someone sane, and &lt;strong&gt;as long as you don't both freak out at the same time, then there's always someone to calm the other one down&lt;/strong&gt;. Right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's the advantage. So I recommend to everyone, marry someone sane.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/the-social-radars/id1677066062?i=1000756176917"&gt;Paul Graham&lt;/a&gt;, The Social Radars podcast interview with Paul Graham, Y Combinator founder.&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="podcast"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Jenny Wen</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/9/wen-ic-skills-managing/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-03-09T06:50:57.693883+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-09T06:50:57.693883+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Mar/9/wen-ic-skills-managing/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/the-design-process-is-dead"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think actually what &lt;strong&gt;being an IC across this past year&lt;/strong&gt; has taught me, is that it actually just &lt;strong&gt;gave me a lot of skills that I don't think I would've gained if I was just managing&lt;/strong&gt; throughout this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/the-design-process-is-dead"&gt;Jenny Wen&lt;/a&gt;, Lenny's Podcast interview. Wen left a director role at Figma to return to IC design work at Anthropic.&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/management"&gt;management&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/design"&gt;design&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="management"/><category term="podcast"/><category term="design"/></entry><entry><title>Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) on Lenny's Podcast</title><link href="https://antolinez.ch/2026/Feb/21/cherny-claude-code-latent-demand/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2026-02-21T19:35:27+00:00</published><updated>2026-02-21T19:35:27+00:00</updated><id>https://antolinez.ch/2026/Feb/21/cherny-claude-code-latent-demand/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/head-of-claude-code-what-happens"&gt;Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) on Lenny&amp;#x27;s Podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
I hadn't come across the term "latent demand" before this podcast, and Boris Cherny calls it the single most important principle in product. The idea of latent demand is to watch how users misuse or hack your product to solve their own use cases, and then build specifically for that. Cherny also extends this to AI. With AI products, you should observe what the &lt;em&gt;model&lt;/em&gt;/&lt;em&gt;agent&lt;/em&gt; is trying to do (e.g., which data it wants to access, which tools are missing, or it has to chain together that could be implemented in a use-case specific tool call), and make that easier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cherny also had an interesting comment on innovation. You can't force it, but you have to give people space and psychological safety to fail, but cut ideas that aren't working. Claude Code itself wasn't explicitly on the roadmap, and it wasn't an obvious hit at launch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also shared an interesting observation on how roles in and around product are changing with AI. Everyone on the Claude Code team—engineers, PMs, designers, etc.—codes, but with a different angle. He thinks the term "software engineer" might disappear by the end of the year and be replaced by something broader, like "builder".


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/coding-agents"&gt;coding-agents&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/product"&gt;product&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://antolinez.ch/tags/podcast"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="coding-agents"/><category term="ai"/><category term="product"/><category term="podcast"/></entry></feed>